chore: update codeowner #436
Conversation
lumtis
requested review from
andresaiello,
brewmaster012,
CharlieMc0,
fadeev and
skosito
as code owners
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as Code Owner
participant Repo as Repository
User->>Repo: Request review
Repo-->>User: Assign review responsibilities
Note right of Repo: After change
User->>Repo: Review request from new owners
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
A GitHub team should be used instead of individuals in CODEOWNERS |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
1-1: LGTM! Good move to team-based ownership.Switching from individual users to GitHub teams is a better practice as it:
- Improves maintainability by centralizing ownership management
- Reduces bus factor by not depending on specific individuals
- Provides better scalability for the organization
Summary by CodeRabbit
@zeta-chain/devexand@zeta-chain/protocol-engineering.